On the temporary and the disposable in Contemporary Art

Ever since grad school, I have come across discussion over people having trouble preserving art from the Modern and Contemporary eras.  Mainly because the materials people use come from delicate sources.  We have gone from Old Masters using durable canvas to easily disposable readymade sculptures.

Do you think it’s because of the widespread use of recording technology, artists now have the freedom to dispose of their works as they see fit?  From Marina Abramovic’s performance art to One Minute Sculptures, people can capture these works’ motion and make it permanent.  As long as someone does not delete it.  While people have devoted articles to the hollow look of reproductive technology (hello Walter Benjamin!), recording equipment still captures the art (or a fragment at least) even after someone destroys it.

Anyone else consider this?  I can’t be the only one to notice this.

About these ads

About Catherine

Art History geek, neophyte bellydancer, amateur musician, photographer

Posted on August 21, 2012, in Art History Miscellany. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. Yeah and it is obvious, so no one really brings it up. How will this affect our future? It wont because art that doesn’t exist, doesn’t exist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 574 other followers

%d bloggers like this: